Command A vs Mistral Large 25.12
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mistral Large 25.12 by Mistral wins on 13 of 17 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 1418 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 73.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%, while Command A scores 13.9 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 9.7.
Coding: In coding, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 82.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 44.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 20.1.
Math: In math, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 78.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 91.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 52.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 2.4.
Context: In context, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 262K on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output. Mistral Large 25.12 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 380 ms for Mistral Large 25.12. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
Mistral Large 25.12 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Mistral Large 25.12 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Mistral Large 25.12?
Mistral Large 25.12 wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Mistral Large 25.12 for coding?
Mistral Large 25.12 is better for coding, scoring 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Mistral Large 25.12?
Yes, Mistral Large 25.12 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Mistral Large 25.12?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 70 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Mistral Large 25.12 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.