Command A vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Llama 4 Maverick by Meta wins on 14 of 18 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Llama 4 Maverick scores 1280 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 80.5% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%, while Command A scores 13.9 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 9.3.
Coding: In coding, Llama 4 Maverick scores 80.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 35.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 38.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 16.3.
Math: In math, Llama 4 Maverick scores 74.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 89.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 44.0%, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 22.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 0.6.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Maverick scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K, while Llama 4 Maverick scores 83.5% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20/1M input and $0.70/1M output. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 100 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 250 ms for Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Llama 4 Maverick — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Llama 4 Maverick for coding?
Llama 4 Maverick is better for coding, scoring 35.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Yes, Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20/1M input and $0.70/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is faster, generating output at 100 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.