Command A vs Llama 3.3 70B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 11 of 15 benchmarks against Llama 3.3 70B by Meta, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 1210, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 72.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 22.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 26.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 11.9.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 34.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 10.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 300 ms for Llama 3.3 70B. Llama 3.3 70B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 3.3 70B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Llama 3.3 70B — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Llama 3.3 70B?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Llama 3.3 70B for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Llama 3.3 70B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.