Command A vs GPT-5.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 by OpenAI wins on 14 of 15 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 scores 1464 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while GPT-5.1 scores 86.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 82.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 49.4 on AA Coding Index compared to Command A's 27.8.
Math: In math, GPT-5.1 scores 95.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 scores 88.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 50.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.1 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1's 95 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 350 ms for GPT-5.1. GPT-5.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GPT-5.1 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs GPT-5.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to GPT-5.1 for coding?
GPT-5.1 is better for coding, scoring 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than GPT-5.1?
Yes, GPT-5.1 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 is faster, generating output at 95 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs GPT-5.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.