Command A vs GPT-4o Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 9 of 15 benchmarks against GPT-4o Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4o Mini's 1220, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4o Mini's 64.0%.
Coding: In coding, both score 78.0% on HumanEval+, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4o Mini's 20.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4o Mini's 28.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to GPT-4o Mini's 11.4.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to GPT-4o Mini's 68.0%, while both score 88.0% on GSM8K.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4o Mini's 40.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4o Mini's 3.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to GPT-4o Mini's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output. GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-4o Mini's 200 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 120 ms for GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-4o Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs GPT-4o Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or GPT-4o Mini?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to GPT-4o Mini for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than GPT-4o Mini?
Yes, GPT-4o Mini is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is faster, generating output at 200 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs GPT-4o Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.