Command A vs GPT-4o

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

GPT-4o by OpenAI wins on 9 of 15 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-4o scores 1280 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while GPT-4o scores 72.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.

Coding: In coding, GPT-4o scores 87.2% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4o's 30.7%, while GPT-4o scores 38.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.

Math: In math, GPT-4o scores 74.6% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while GPT-4o scores 92.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-4o scores 53.6% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4o's 5.0%.

Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to GPT-4o's 128K, while GPT-4o scores 91.6% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.

Pricing Comparison

Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Both models are priced identically for input tokens.

Speed Comparison

Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-4o's 143 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 450 ms for GPT-4o. GPT-4o delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing coding, Command A has the edge. For those who value general intelligence and math and speed, GPT-4o is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

Command A vs GPT-4o — FAQ

Which is better, Command A or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Command A compare to GPT-4o for coding?

Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.7%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is Command A cheaper than GPT-4o?

Both models are priced the same at $2.5/1M input tokens. Command A output costs $10.0/1M and GPT-4o output costs $10.0/1M.

Which is faster, Command A or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o is faster, generating output at 143 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Command A vs GPT-4o comparison cover?

This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.