Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 14 of 18 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16.7 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Command A's 13.9.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 33.3 on AA Coding Index compared to Command A's 27.8.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 3.5.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.8% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Command A delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Command A has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Command A is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.