Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite by Google, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 1230, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 63.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 70.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 22.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 28.0%.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 62.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 83.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 32.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 14.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's 240 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 70 ms for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is faster, generating output at 240 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.