Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Flash by Google wins on 14 of 15 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 1320 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 73.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 82.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 38.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 42.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 76.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 91.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 48.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 25.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 90.2% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/1M input and $2.5/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's 251 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 410 ms for Gemini 2.5 Flash. Gemini 2.5 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Gemini 2.5 Flash for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is better for coding, scoring 38.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/1M input and $2.5/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster, generating output at 251 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.