Command A vs DeepSeek V3.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek V3.2 by DeepSeek wins on 12 of 15 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek V3.2 scores 1370 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek V3.2 scores 87.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 73.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 44.2 on AA Coding Index compared to Command A's 27.8.
Math: In math, DeepSeek V3.2 scores 85.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 94.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek V3.2 scores 60.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores 42.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek V3.2's 164K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.27/1M input and $0.40/1M output. DeepSeek V3.2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to DeepSeek V3.2's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 400 ms for DeepSeek V3.2. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs DeepSeek V3.2 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or DeepSeek V3.2?
DeepSeek V3.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (12 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to DeepSeek V3.2 for coding?
DeepSeek V3.2 is better for coding, scoring 73.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2?
Yes, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.27/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or DeepSeek V3.2?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 70 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs DeepSeek V3.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.