Command A vs DeepSeek V3.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 1340 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 78.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 84.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 46.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 48.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 82.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 92.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 55.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 164K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.95/1M output. DeepSeek V3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 65 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 450 ms for DeepSeek V3.1. Command A delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Command A has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, DeepSeek V3.1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs DeepSeek V3.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or DeepSeek V3.1?
DeepSeek V3.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to DeepSeek V3.1 for coding?
DeepSeek V3.1 is better for coding, scoring 46.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1?
Yes, DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.95/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or DeepSeek V3.1?
Command A is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs DeepSeek V3.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.