Command A vs DeepSeek R1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek wins on 11 of 18 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 scores 1355 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while DeepSeek R1 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%, while Command A scores 13.9 on AA Intelligence Index compared to DeepSeek R1's 11.4.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 scores 86.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while DeepSeek R1 scores 49.2% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while DeepSeek R1 scores 50.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to DeepSeek R1's 24.6.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 scores 97.3% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while DeepSeek R1 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 scores 71.5% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1's 14.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to DeepSeek R1's 1.1.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1's 64K, while DeepSeek R1 scores 82.0% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 costs $0.70/1M input and $2.5/1M output. DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to DeepSeek R1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 950 ms for DeepSeek R1. Command A delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Command A has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs DeepSeek R1 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or DeepSeek R1?
DeepSeek R1 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to DeepSeek R1 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 is better for coding, scoring 49.2% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than DeepSeek R1?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.70/1M input and $2.5/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or DeepSeek R1?
Command A is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs DeepSeek R1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.