Codestral vs Command A
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Codestral by Mistral wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Codestral scores 1260 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while both score 68.0% on MMLU-Pro.
Coding: In coding, Codestral scores 86.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Codestral scores 40.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Codestral scores 48.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, both score 72.0% on MATH, while both score 88.0% on GSM8K.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Codestral's 44.0%, while Codestral scores 24.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, both score 256K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Codestral costs $0.30/1M input tokens and $0.90/1M output tokens, while Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Codestral is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Codestral generates output at 90 tok/s compared to Command A's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 280 ms for Codestral versus 400 ms for Command A. Codestral delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Codestral leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Codestral vs Command A — FAQ
Which is better, Codestral or Command A?
Codestral wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Codestral compare to Command A for coding?
Codestral is better for coding, scoring 40.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Codestral cheaper than Command A?
Yes, Codestral is cheaper. Codestral costs $0.30/1M input and $0.90/1M output tokens. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Codestral or Command A?
Codestral is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Codestral vs Command A comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.