Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o1 Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 8 of 14 benchmarks against o1 Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 1395 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to o1 Mini's 1300, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to o1 Mini's 75.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 91.0% on HumanEval+ compared to o1 Mini's 89.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 79.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to o1 Mini's 45.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 65.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to o1 Mini's 48.0%.
Math: In math, o1 Mini scores 90.0% on MATH compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 88.0%, while both score 96.0% on GSM8K.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 74.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to o1 Mini's 60.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to o1 Mini's 25.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to o1 Mini's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while o1 Mini costs $3.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output. Both models are priced identically for input tokens.
Speed Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 generates output at 57 tok/s compared to o1 Mini's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 790 ms for Claude Sonnet 4.6 versus 500 ms for o1 Mini. o1 Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge. For those who value math and speed, o1 Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o1 Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o1 Mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Sonnet 4.6 compare to o1 Mini for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 79.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 45.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper than o1 Mini?
Both models are priced the same at $3.0/1M input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 output costs $15.0/1M and o1 Mini output costs $12.0/1M.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o1 Mini?
o1 Mini is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 57 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o1 Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.