Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command R
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 by Anthropic wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Command R by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 1380 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command R's 1130, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command R's 52.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command R's 62.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 77.2% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command R's 12.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 62.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command R's 18.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 87.0% on MATH compared to Command R's 45.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Command R's 72.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 83.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command R's 25.0%, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 45.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command R's 5.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command R's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while Command R costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output. Command R is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 generates output at 67 tok/s compared to Command R's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1170 ms for Claude Sonnet 4.5 versus 300 ms for Command R. Command R delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Command R is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command R — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Command R?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Sonnet 4.5 compare to Command R for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better for coding, scoring 77.2% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 12.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 cheaper than Command R?
Yes, Command R is cheaper. Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. Command R costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Command R?
Command R is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 67 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command R comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.