Claude Opus 4 vs Pixtral Large
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Pixtral Large by Mistral, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Pixtral Large's 1270, while Claude Opus 4 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Pixtral Large's 70.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Pixtral Large's 80.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Pixtral Large's 35.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 60.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Pixtral Large's 40.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4 scores 86.0% on MATH compared to Pixtral Large's 74.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 95.0% on GSM8K compared to Pixtral Large's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4 scores 79.6% on GPQA Diamond compared to Pixtral Large's 48.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 45.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Pixtral Large's 22.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Pixtral Large's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output. Pixtral Large is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4 generates output at 50 tok/s compared to Pixtral Large's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 550 ms for Claude Opus 4 versus 400 ms for Pixtral Large. Pixtral Large delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4 vs Pixtral Large — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Pixtral Large?
Claude Opus 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4 compare to Pixtral Large for coding?
Claude Opus 4 is better for coding, scoring 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 35.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than Pixtral Large?
Yes, Pixtral Large is cheaper. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 50 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4 vs Pixtral Large comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.