Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-5 Nano

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic wins on 11 of 17 benchmarks against GPT-5 Nano by OpenAI, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-5 Nano's 1200, while Claude Opus 4 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-5 Nano's 62.0%.

Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-5 Nano's 72.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-5 Nano's 25.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 60.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-5 Nano's 30.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 1171 on Design Arena ELO compared to GPT-5 Nano's 1071, while Claude Opus 4 scores 1177 on Website Arena ELO compared to GPT-5 Nano's 1113.

Math: In math, Claude Opus 4 scores 86.0% on MATH compared to GPT-5 Nano's 65.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 95.0% on GSM8K compared to GPT-5 Nano's 85.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4 scores 79.6% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-5 Nano's 70.9%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 45.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-5 Nano's 15.0%.

Context: In context, GPT-5 Nano scores 400K on Context Length compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K.

Pricing Comparison

Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input and $0.40/1M output. GPT-5 Nano is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

Claude Opus 4 generates output at 50 tok/s compared to GPT-5 Nano's 250 tok/s, and the time to first token is 550 ms for Claude Opus 4 versus 80 ms for GPT-5 Nano. GPT-5 Nano delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-5 Nano is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-5 Nano — FAQ

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-5 Nano?

Claude Opus 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Claude Opus 4 compare to GPT-5 Nano for coding?

Claude Opus 4 is better for coding, scoring 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 25.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than GPT-5 Nano?

Yes, GPT-5 Nano is cheaper. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-5 Nano?

GPT-5 Nano is faster, generating output at 250 tok/s compared to 50 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-5 Nano comparison cover?

This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.