Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic wins on 11 of 16 benchmarks against GPT-4o Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4o Mini's 1220, while Claude Opus 4 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4o Mini's 64.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to GPT-4o Mini's 80.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-4o Mini's 78.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4o Mini's 20.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 60.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4o Mini's 28.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4 scores 86.0% on MATH compared to GPT-4o Mini's 68.0%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 95.0% on GSM8K compared to GPT-4o Mini's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4 scores 79.6% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4o Mini's 43.4%, while Claude Opus 4 scores 45.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4o Mini's 3.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4 scores 200K on Context Length compared to GPT-4o Mini's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output. GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4 generates output at 50 tok/s compared to GPT-4o Mini's 200 tok/s, and the time to first token is 550 ms for Claude Opus 4 versus 120 ms for GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-4o Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4o Mini?
Claude Opus 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4 compare to GPT-4o Mini for coding?
Claude Opus 4 is better for coding, scoring 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than GPT-4o Mini?
Yes, GPT-4o Mini is cheaper. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is faster, generating output at 200 tok/s compared to 50 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.