Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.1 Codex
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI wins on 3 of 5 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.7 scores 89.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 65.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.7 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 400K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 Codex is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
GPT-5.1 Codex leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.1 Codex — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
GPT-5.1 Codex wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to GPT-5.1 Codex for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than GPT-5.1 Codex?
Yes, GPT-5.1 Codex is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.1 Codex comparison cover?
This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.