Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Nano
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Nemotron 3 Nano by NVIDIA wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Nemotron 3 Nano scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 200K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Nemotron 3 Nano's 76 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 250 ms for Nemotron 3 Nano. Nemotron 3 Nano delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Nemotron 3 Nano leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Nano — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Nemotron 3 Nano?
Nemotron 3 Nano wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Nemotron 3 Nano for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Nemotron 3 Nano?
Nemotron 3 Nano is faster, generating output at 76 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Nano comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.