Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ministral 3 14B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Ministral 3 14B by Mistral wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Ministral 3 14B scores 256K on Context Length compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 200K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Ministral 3 14B's 83 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 380 ms for Ministral 3 14B. Ministral 3 14B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Ministral 3 14B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ministral 3 14B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Ministral 3 14B?
Ministral 3 14B wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Ministral 3 14B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Ministral 3 14B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Ministral 3 14B?
Ministral 3 14B is faster, generating output at 83 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ministral 3 14B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.