Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
MiMo V2 Flash by Xiaomi wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, MiMo V2 Flash scores 256K on Context Length compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 200K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to MiMo V2 Flash's 155 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 1180 ms for MiMo V2 Flash. MiMo V2 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
MiMo V2 Flash leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo V2 Flash?
MiMo V2 Flash wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to MiMo V2 Flash for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than MiMo V2 Flash?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo V2 Flash?
MiMo V2 Flash is faster, generating output at 155 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.