Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GLM-4.6V by Zhipu AI wins on 4 of 6 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GLM-4.6V's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while GLM-4.6V costs $0.30/1M input and $0.90/1M output. GLM-4.6V is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to GLM-4.6V's 68 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 770 ms for GLM-4.6V. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
GLM-4.6V leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GLM-4.6V for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GLM-4.6V?
Yes, GLM-4.6V is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. GLM-4.6V costs $0.30/1M input and $0.90/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-4.6V?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 68 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V comparison cover?
This comparison covers 6 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.