Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic and GLM-4.6V by Zhipu AI are evenly matched across 3 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to GLM-4.6V's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to GLM-4.6V's 68 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 770 ms for GLM-4.6V. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.6V are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-4.6V?
Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.6V are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GLM-4.6V for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GLM-4.6V?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-4.6V?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 68 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.6V comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.