Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemma 3 12B by Google wins on 3 of 4 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05/1M input and $0.15/1M output. Gemma 3 12B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Gemma 3 12B's 90 tok/s. Gemma 3 12B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemma 3 12B leads across the board in affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Gemma 3 12B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Gemma 3 12B?
Yes, Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05/1M input and $0.15/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Output Speed, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.