Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic and Gemma 3 12B by Google are evenly matched across 2 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Gemma 3 12B's 90 tok/s. Gemma 3 12B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemma 3 12B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 12B?
Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 12B are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Gemma 3 12B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Gemma 3 12B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 2 benchmarks including Output Speed, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.