Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic wins on 8 of 17 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 1220, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 65.0%, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 17.6 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Command A's 13.9.
Coding: In coding, both score 78.0% on HumanEval+, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 30.0%, while both score 35.0% on LiveCodeBench, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 43.9 on AA Coding Index compared to Command A's 27.8.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 70.0%, while both score 88.0% on GSM8K.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 40.0%, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 10.3 on AA Agentic Index compared to Command A's 3.6.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input tokens and $5.0/1M output tokens, while Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 generates output at 180 tok/s compared to Command A's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 120 ms for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus 400 ms for Command A. Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Command A is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A?
Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Command A for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Command A?
Yes, Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input and $5.0/1M output tokens. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is faster, generating output at 180 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A comparison cover?
This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.