Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen 3 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 235B by Qwen wins on 12 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Qwen 3 235B scores 1320 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while Qwen 3 235B scores 77.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 235B scores 84.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3 Opus's 78.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 46.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, Qwen 3 235B scores 82.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 93.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3 Opus's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 235B's 55.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 235B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output. Qwen 3 235B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 235B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 450 ms for Qwen 3 235B. Qwen 3 235B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 235B leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen 3 235B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B wins on more benchmarks overall (12 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Qwen 3 235B for coding?
Qwen 3 235B is better for coding, scoring 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Qwen 3 235B?
Yes, Qwen 3 235B is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen 3 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.