Claude 3 Opus vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 13 of 16 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while o1 scores 92.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3 Opus's 82.0%, while o1 scores 47.0% on SimpleQA compared to Claude 3 Opus's 29.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3 Opus's 78.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3 Opus's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%.
Context: In context, both score 200K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Both models are priced identically for input tokens.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 1000 ms for o1. o1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
o1 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or o1?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to o1 for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than o1?
Both models are priced the same at $15.0/1M input tokens. Claude 3 Opus output costs $75.0/1M and o1 output costs $60.0/1M.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or o1?
o1 is faster, generating output at 35 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, SimpleQA, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.