Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral wins on 8 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while Claude 3 Opus scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 66.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude 3 Opus scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 77.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 34.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, both score 68.0% on MATH, while Claude 3 Opus scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 40.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 110 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 200 ms for Mistral Medium 3.1. Mistral Medium 3.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Medium 3.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is better for coding, scoring 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Yes, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is faster, generating output at 110 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.