Claude 3 Opus vs Mercury 2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mercury 2 by Inception wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mercury 2's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.75/1M output. Mercury 2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Mercury 2 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Mercury 2 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Mercury 2?
Mercury 2 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Mercury 2 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Mercury 2?
Yes, Mercury 2 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.75/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Mercury 2?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Mercury 2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.