Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic wins on 13 of 19 benchmarks against Llama 3.3 70B by Meta, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude 3 Opus scores 1240 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 1210, while Claude 3 Opus scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 8.8 on MT-Bench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 8.6, while Claude 3 Opus scores 29.0% on SimpleQA compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 21.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 81.0% on TruthfulQA compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 73.5%.
Coding: In coding, Claude 3 Opus scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 72.0%, while both score 22.0% on SWE-bench Verified, while Claude 3 Opus scores 32.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 26.0%.
Math: In math, Claude 3 Opus scores 68.0% on MATH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 34.0%, while Llama 3.3 70B scores 10.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 86.8% on BBH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 81.5%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 90.5% on Winogrande compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 85.5%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 300 ms for Llama 3.3 70B. Llama 3.3 70B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing general intelligence and math, Claude 3 Opus has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 3.3 70B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B?
Claude 3 Opus wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Llama 3.3 70B for coding?
Both models score 22.0% on SWE-bench Verified, making them equally capable for coding tasks.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 19 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, SimpleQA, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.