Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Kimi K2 Thinking by Vertex wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Reasoning: In reasoning, Kimi K2 Thinking scores 83.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%.

Context: In context, Kimi K2 Thinking scores 262K on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.

Pricing Comparison

Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60/1M input and $2.5/1M output. Kimi K2 Thinking is the more affordable option for API usage.

Verdict

Kimi K2 Thinking leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2 Thinking — FAQ

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2 Thinking wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?

SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Kimi K2 Thinking?

Yes, Kimi K2 Thinking is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60/1M input and $2.5/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.

What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison cover?

This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.