Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2.6
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Kimi K2.6 by Moonshot AI wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, Kimi K2.6 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%.
Context: In context, Kimi K2.6 scores 262K on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95/1M input and $4.0/1M output. Kimi K2.6 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Kimi K2.6 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2.6 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Kimi K2.6 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Kimi K2.6?
Yes, Kimi K2.6 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95/1M input and $4.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Kimi K2.6?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2.6 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.