Claude 3 Opus vs Grok 4.6
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Grok 4.6 by xAI wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, Grok 4.6 scores 93.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%.
Context: In context, Grok 4.6 scores 500K on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Grok 4.6 costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output. Grok 4.6 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Grok 4.6 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Grok 4.6 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Grok 4.6 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Yes, Grok 4.6 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Grok 4.6 costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Grok 4.6?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Grok 4.6 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.