Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Astra
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-6 Astra scores 94.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%.
Context: In context, GPT-6 Astra scores 1.1M on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10.0/1M input and $50.0/1M output. GPT-6 Astra is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
GPT-6 Astra leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Astra — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to GPT-6 Astra for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than GPT-6 Astra?
Yes, GPT-6 Astra is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs $10.0/1M input and $50.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Astra?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Astra comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.