Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic wins on 9 of 16 benchmarks against GPT-4o Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude 3 Opus scores 1240 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4o Mini's 1220, while Claude 3 Opus scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4o Mini's 64.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 82.0% on IFEval compared to GPT-4o Mini's 80.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 29.0% on SimpleQA compared to GPT-4o Mini's 10.5%.
Coding: In coding, both score 78.0% on HumanEval+, while Claude 3 Opus scores 22.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4o Mini's 20.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 32.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4o Mini's 28.0%.
Math: In math, both score 68.0% on MATH, while both score 88.0% on GSM8K.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4o Mini's 40.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 8.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4o Mini's 3.0%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to GPT-4o Mini's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output. GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to GPT-4o Mini's 200 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 120 ms for GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence, Claude 3 Opus has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-4o Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4o Mini?
Claude 3 Opus wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to GPT-4o Mini for coding?
Claude 3 Opus is better for coding, scoring 22.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than GPT-4o Mini?
Yes, GPT-4o Mini is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is faster, generating output at 200 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, SimpleQA, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.