Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 19 of 19 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 9.3 on MT-Bench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.8, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3 Opus's 82.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.8% on TruthfulQA compared to Claude 3 Opus's 81.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3 Opus's 78.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3 Opus's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 94.5% on BBH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 86.8%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 92.0% on Winogrande compared to Claude 3 Opus's 90.5%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (19 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster, generating output at 55 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 19 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, IFEval, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.