Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek V3.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek wins on 13 of 19 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 1340 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 78.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while both score 8.8 on MT-Bench, while Claude 3 Opus scores 29.0% on SimpleQA compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 24.9%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 81.0% on TruthfulQA compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 76.5%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 84.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3 Opus's 78.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 46.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 48.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek V3.1 scores 82.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 92.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3 Opus's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 55.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%, while DeepSeek V3.1 scores 87.5% on BBH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 86.8%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 90.5% on Winogrande compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 87.5%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 164K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.95/1M output. DeepSeek V3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 65 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 450 ms for DeepSeek V3.1. DeepSeek V3.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
DeepSeek V3.1 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek V3.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek V3.1?
DeepSeek V3.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to DeepSeek V3.1 for coding?
DeepSeek V3.1 is better for coding, scoring 46.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1?
Yes, DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.95/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek V3.1?
DeepSeek V3.1 is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek V3.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 19 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, SimpleQA, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.