Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

GPT-5.1 by OpenAI wins on 16 of 16 benchmarks against Claude 3.5 Sonnet by Anthropic, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 scores 1464 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 1268, while GPT-5.1 scores 86.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 73.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 91.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 86.0%.

Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 81.7%, while GPT-5.1 scores 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 49.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 82.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 38.0%.

Math: In math, GPT-5.1 scores 95.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 78.3%, while GPT-5.1 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 91.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 94.0% on AIME 2025 compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 23.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 scores 88.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 59.4%, while GPT-5.1 scores 50.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 15.0%.

Context: In context, GPT-5.1 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 200K.

Pricing Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1's 95 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Claude 3.5 Sonnet versus 350 ms for GPT-5.1. GPT-5.1 delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

GPT-5.1 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

View Individual Model Pages

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1 — FAQ

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (16 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to GPT-5.1 for coding?

GPT-5.1 is better for coding, scoring 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 49.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than GPT-5.1?

Yes, GPT-5.1 is cheaper. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.1 is faster, generating output at 95 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1 comparison cover?

This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.