Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Command A
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet by Anthropic wins on 9 of 15 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 1268 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 73.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 81.7% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 49.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 38.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 78.3% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 91.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while both score 15.0% on ARC-AGI.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 200K, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 89.5% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Command A is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Command A's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Claude 3.5 Sonnet versus 400 ms for Command A. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge. For those who value affordability, Command A is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Command A — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Command A?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Command A for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is better for coding, scoring 49.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Command A?
Yes, Command A is cheaper. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Command A?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 70 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Command A comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.