Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 1180, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 74.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 22.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 28.0%.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 62.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 84.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 35.0%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 12.0%.
Context: In context, both score 200K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input tokens and $4.0/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku generates output at 170 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 100 ms for Claude 3.5 Haiku versus 1000 ms for o1. Claude 3.5 Haiku delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, o1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or o1?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to o1 for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than o1?
Yes, Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input and $4.0/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or o1?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster, generating output at 170 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.