Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command A
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 1180, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 74.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 22.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 28.0%.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 62.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 84.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 35.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 12.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input tokens and $4.0/1M output tokens, while Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku generates output at 170 tok/s compared to Command A's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 100 ms for Claude 3.5 Haiku versus 400 ms for Command A. Claude 3.5 Haiku delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Command A is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command A — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Command A?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Command A for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Command A?
Yes, Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input and $4.0/1M output tokens. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Command A?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster, generating output at 170 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command A comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.